Questions & Answers
What should I do if I am stopped or approached by the police?
See the information here:
If You're Stopped.
How does the government initiate charges
against me?
You may be investigated for a criminal offense and receive a written
citation from the officer who has investigated you. Or, you may
be released without a citation, and later receive a summons to appear
in the mail for a hearing, which can take place months or years later.
This period of time between the alleged crime and the “deadline” to
file charges against you is known as the “statute of limitations.” If
charges are not filed against you and you are released, it does not
mean the case is over. You may receive a summons to come to
court after the government has completed investigation and has decided
how to proceed.
If charges aren’t filed against me for months, doesn’t
that violate my right to a speedy trial?
The answer to this question depends on the state you are in and the
exact circumstances of your case. If you have been arrested for
a marijuana or drug crime, the government may need to file charges
within a certain time period. If you have been arrested for a
marijuana or drug crime, you should consult
with one of our attorneys immediately even if you have not
been charged yet.
If there is a very large and unreasonable delay in filing your charge,
a good drug defense attorney can sometimes create an issue even if it
is filed within the statute of limitations. Often, this would
require actual proof that you have suffered “prejudice” from the delay
in filing your case. This is hard to prove, but it’s worth
discussing with your marijuana defense lawyer if you think it may
apply.
Should I talk to a lawyer before
charges are filed against me?
It is important to consult an attorney as soon as possible after you
are aware that you are being investigated or charged with a crime.
Some important work can be done prior to the filing of charges against
you. And if charges are filed, some legal objections and
challenges must be raised by an attorney at the first appearance or
they are “waived” and you can no longer raise these issues at a later
time. Having an attorney at every stage of the proceedings means
that all your rights are protected. As stated above, you should
consult with one of our attorneys
immediately even if you have not been charged yet.
Also, it’s important to have a good drug defense attorney begin the
process of investigation – witnesses’ memories fade, and information
helpful to your defense may become harder to obtain as time goes on.
An attorney can also advise you about taking remedial action quickly,
in order to show the Judge and Prosecutor how seriously you take the
allegations. For example, a drug crime defense lawyer may
recommend to clients prior to the filing of their charges that they
obtain (confidential) chemical dependency evaluations, install an
ignition interlock device on their vehicle, enter counseling, begin
community service, or one of many other options that may be helpful to
their particular cases.
What if I don’t like
the judge on my case?
Depending on the state you are in,
you may have the right to object to one judge on your case by filing
what’s called an “affidavit of prejudice” or a similar pleading.
You may need to demonstrate that there was actually a reason to
conclude that the judge would be prejudiced against you specifically.
In fact, most affidavits of prejudice are often filed for legal and
tactical reasons by a criminal defense attorney. You should
consult with a qualified drug crime defense lawyer before making a
single court appearance in your case, because if you appear before a
judge for one hearing and you do not object to the judge hearing your
case, you most likely have waived your ability to object to that judge
later.
You may also be able to disqualify a judge from your case if
you can demonstrate “actual” prejudice. For example, if the
judge knows you personally and has a personal grudge against you and
you can prove this, the judge should recuse him or herself from
hearing your case. This demonstration of “actual” prejudice is
necessary to remove another judge from hearing your case.
Otherwise, you may be stuck with whoever is assigned to hear your
matter.
What if I don’t like
the prosecutor on my case?
Usually, unless you can demonstrate some actual conflict of interest
in the prosecutor handling your case, there’s not really a chance of
having a specific prosecutor from your case.
What kind of process
can I expect once the case is filed?
In most states,
you will face misdemeanor drug charges in either state or municipal
court. The first hearing you can expect is the arraignment.
At that time, a formal “complaint” is filed against you (a document
that lists the specific charge(s) against you, and you will usually
(on the advice of an attorney) enter a plea of “not guilty.”
This does not preclude you from changing your plea at a later time,
and it preserves all your rights. If asked, you should not waive
your right to a jury or speedy trial at this time. The judge
also has the authority to set some “conditions” on your behavior while
the case is pending. The judge can order bail/bond, if there is
a fear for public safety or some reason to consider you a flight risk.
At arraignment, the “speedy trial clock” usually starts ticking.
From that hearing, your matter is typically set for some type of
pretrial hearing. Your next hearing may be called “case setting”
a “pretrial conference” or many other names. Some courts forego
a pretrial hearing and set the matter directly for a “trial call”
calendar, which is the step before trial, when your case is confirmed
for a trial.
In a felony matter, your case can be initiated in a number of ways.
Depending on the nature of the charge and the state in which
your case is charged, you could be required to appear for a bail
setting hearing, where the judge determines if there is probable cause
to restrict your freedom by imposing conditions of release.
Conditions of release may include bail or bond, requirements to remain
in a location, restrictions upon your use of alcohol or drugs, or
orders to refrain from contacting victims or witnesses involved in the
case. If charges are not filed at this first hearing, the State
typically has 72 hours in which they must either charge you with a
criminal offense, or you must be released. If you are released,
they may file the offense months or years later, after investigation
is complete. The time frame for filing is known as the “statute
of limitations.”
You have a constitutionally protected right to a jury trial for a
criminal offense (unless you are charged in juvenile court). The
prosecutor also has a right to demand a jury trial in some
circumstaqnces, even if you wish the trial to be held before a judge.
It’s best to consult with a marijuana attorney about the best strategy
in your particular case regarding the type of trial to request.
Most cases do not proceed to a full trial. Over 90% of cases
settle with some sort of resolution (either a plea, deferred
prosecution, diversion, etc.). However, it is in your best
interest to hire a good drug defense lawyer who is prepared to proceed
to trial if that is in your best interest.
What are the possible
consequences of a criminal marijuana related conviction?
The
consequences of a drug conviction can be quite drastic. Beyond
the basic effects of a criminal charge or conviction, a drug
conviction in particular can cause a loss of your drivers license
(even if no vehicle was involved in your charge), the loss of housing
rights, or the loss of your ability to obtain federal student loans.
Along with the criminal consequences of drug possession and
distribution, you can face the loss of real and personal property,
through a process known as “civil forfeiture.” If law
enforcement has reason to believe your home, land, or personal
property (including vehicles) was used in the context of drug
possession, cultivation, manufacturing, or distribution of drugs.
If you have received any notices from the government indicating that
your property may be forfeited, we STRONGLY suggest you consult with a
drug defense lawyer IMMEDIATELY. There are often very short
timelines for responding to forfeiture notices.
What is a "Drug
Court"?
Since the 1980’s,
several courts in the U.S. began an experiment with “drug
courts” – where the court process was hoped to reduce drug use and
recidivism. The programs usually target non-violent drug
offenders whose legal charges stem primarily from addiction. If
a defendant is given an opportunity to “opt-in” to a drug court, he or
she is usually obligated to participate in a substantial drug
treatment program, often fully funded by the drug court program.
Frequent urinalysis tests are required, and status hearings with the
drug court judge are important. The focus of the court
proceedings are much more supportive, encouraging, and directive than
a standard criminal court proceeding. Some drug courts require
participants to pay court fees, keep up with child support, and
maintain approved housing. If the defendant keeps up with all
court-ordered obligations and treatment requirements, the charge may
be dismissed at a later time.
What about medical
marijuana?
Several states have
passed medical marijuana laws. Each state's laws are complicated
an unique. In many states, you must first get a medical
marijuana license or certificate before
you possess or use marijuana to avoid a charge. Some states also
allow a caretaker to possess marijuana for you. The
qualifications for a medical marijuana certificate or license vary
drastically from state to state. Most states also impose a limit
on the amount you can lawfully possess. If you are a medical
marijuana user, or plan to become one, we STRONGLY suggest you consult
with a knowledgeable marijuana defense attorney before you begin the
process. An experienced marijuana lawyer may will be able to
guide you through the process of obtaining a valid certificate and
prevent you from getting caught in any traps.
Click here to find a knowledgeable
marijuana defense attorney in your area.
Remember, federal laws still prohibit the possession of marijuana,
even for medicinal purposes. Even if you have a medical
certificate for medicinal use of marijuana in your state, you can
potentially face federal charges for possession. Talk to your
drug defense lawyer and your physician about the risks and options of
medicinal use of marijuana.
What constitutional
cases and theories would an experienced drug lawyer evaluate when
analyzing my constitutional rights during a stop for driving under the
influence of marijuana or other drugs?
The United States
Supreme Court interprets the United States Constitution to give
defendants powerful protections during arrests for driving under the
influence of marijuana or other drugs. No state may
overrule these protections. However, an experienced drug
attorney will know whether your state constitution offers more
protection for your rights than the United States Constitution.
Under the United States
Constitution police may stop your car for driving under the influence
of marijuana or other drugs when they have either:
(1) A reasonable and
articuable suspicion that a crime has occurred. Delaware v. Prouse,
440 U.S. 648 (1979); United States v. Cortez, 449 US.
411 (1981) ; or
(2) Probable cause to
believe that a traffic violation has occurred. Whren v. US.,
517 U.S. 806 (1996); or
(3) A proper sobriety
checkpoint that has been established and justified by public interest.
The department must document in writing appropriate procedures to be
followed in establishing and conducting a checkpoint, and law
enforcement must implement those procedures. Michigan Dep't of
State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990); City of Indianapolis
v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000).
During
a traffic stop, officers may detain a driver to check for outstanding
warrants and ask for relevant information about license, vehicle
ownership, registration, insurance, and the driver's destination.
Pennsylvania v. Mimms,
434 U.S. 106 (1978). Also, there is no reasonable expectation of
privacy in the VIN number and officers are allowed to remove obstacles
that obstruct the view of the number.
New
York v. Class,
475 U.S. 106 (1986).
Roadside questioning as the result of a routine traffic stop does not
constitute custodial interrogation for purposes of the Fifth
Amendment. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
Police
may conduct a search shortly before, during, or after a lawful arrest
for driving under the influence of marijuana. Chimel v.
California,
395 US. 753
Marijuana, pot, or other drugs falling within the plain view of a
police officer who has the right to arrest you for driving under the
influence of marijuana or other drugs can be seized and can be
introduced as evidence. Harris v.
United
States,
390 U.S. 234 (1968).
The
United States Constitution allows searches to occur at the same time
as an arrest for driving under the influence of marijuana or other
drugs because there may be a need to seize weapons and/or there may be
a need to prevent the destruction of evidence of marijuana or other
drugs.
Preston
v. United States,
376 US. 364 (1964) The constitutional right to search a car
without a search warrant is based upon the reasonable belief of an
officer that the car contains marijuana, pot or other illegal drugs
combined with the difficulty of securing a search warrant for a
movable object.
Carroll v.
United
States,
267 U.S. 132 (1925); Welsh v.
Wisconsin,
466 U.S. 740 (1984).
During
a stop for driving under the influence of marijuana, a protective
search of the passenger compartment of a vehicle is limited to those
areas in which a weapon may be placed or hidden. However,
this search may only be permissible if the police officer reasonably
believes the suspect may be dangerous and may gain immediate control
of a weapon.
Michigan v. Long,
463 U.S. 1032 (1983).
A drug
detecting dog smelling an automobile's outside for marijuana or other
drugs does not constitute a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth
Amendment. City of
Indianapolis v. Edmond,
531
U.S. 32 (2000).
Police
may conduct a search as part of an inventory search governed by a
specific agency policy.
South
Dakota v. Opperman,
428
U.S. 364 (1976).
Any
consent given to police officers allowing them to search during a drug
arrest for driving under the influence of marijuana or other drugs
must be voluntary and knowing. Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte,
412 US. 218 (1973).
However, police may not search a car without a warrant if the police
only issue a traffic ticket. Knowles v.
Iowa,
525 U.S. 113 (1998).
These constitutional
protections are very likely important to your case. An
experienced marijuana or drug defense attorney will consider all of
the above issues, as well as many other cases, statutes, rules,
regulations, policies, and other laws in considering your best
defense.
What should an
experienced drug lawyer tell his clients about saliva test kits and
driving under the influence of marijuana or other drugs?
In
response to concerns over driving while under the influence of
marijuana or other drugs, all 50 states have enacted laws prohibiting
driving while under the influence of marijuana or other drugs.
Drug
detection may be difficult for police making a stop or arrest for
driving while under the influence of marijuana. Unlike driving
under the influence of alcohol, where officers can use preliminary
breath tests, there are limited roadside devices that can detect the
presence of marijuana or other drugs.
There
are several saliva test kits for marijuana or other drugs currently on
the market or in development. Manufacturers claim that these kits can
immediately detect the presence of marijuana or illegal drugs in a
driver’s system. The manufacturers also claim that these devices are
efficient, noninvasive, uncomplicated, and reliable.
Most of
the manufacturers are claiming their devices are screening devices
designed to only provide a rough qualitative indication of marijuana
or other drugs. However, one manufacturer has claimed to have
developed a saliva test system to provide a "quantitative" measurement
of marijuana or drugs.
Should
these manufacturers' claims prove to be validated by independent
testing, saliva test kits may prove to be quite prevalent in law
enforcement.
An
experienced drug attorney will know how to challenge a saliva drug
test if it was used in your in your drug arrest for driving under the
influence of marijuana or other drugs. There is no standard
answer to this question. If you anticipate that this situation
will come up in your case, we recommend you
contact an experienced marijuana defense attorney in your area.
How may driving be
affected by marijuana?
The
government will allege that a driver under the influence of marijuana
lacked reaction time and the ability to perceive danger the way other
drivers would have. However, several studies that have
been done indicate that some drivers are better drivers when
they are under the influence of marijuana. Other studies have
indicated an impairment is created when a person drives under the
influence of marijuana. So, it is very possible that a
knowledgeable marijuana defense lawyer can significantly help you if
you are charged with driving under the influence of marijuana.
What do police
look for in someone driving a motorcycle while making a drug stop or
drug arrest for driving under the influence of marijuana or other
drugs?
A common cause of
single vehicle motorcycle crashes is the failure to negotiate curves.
More specifically, the motorcyclist will continue in a straight line
until it strikes a stationary object. Impaired balance and
coordination causes this. In less drastic cases, the motorcycle’s turn
radius expands during the turn. The motorcycle drifts outside of the
lane or into another lane, while turning a corner. Police and
prosecutors will look at this because there is a better than average
possibility that the motorcyclist is driving under the influence,
quite possibly under the influence of pot or other illegal drugs.
Police and
prosecutors consider parking and dismounting a motorcycle a useful
field sobriety test for driving under the influence. First, the
motorcyclist must decide upon a safe place to stop the motorcycle. The
motorcyclist must stop the engine. Then the motorcyclist must
find and deploy the kick-stand. The motorcyclist must then distribute
his weight onto one foot while swinging the other foot over the seat
in order to get off the motorcycle. Police and prosecutors may
consider problems with this sequence as evidence of driving under the
influence of pot, marijuana, or other illegal drugs.
Police and
prosecutors will also consider trouble with balance when evaluating
whether someone is driving under the influence of marijuana or other
illegal drugs. Commonly a motorcyclist will place one foot on
the ground to maintain an upright motorcycle, while leaving the other
foot covering the brake pedal. However, some riders stabilize by
placing both feet on the ground. Riders whose balance has been
impaired by marijuana, pot or other drugs may find balance difficult.
To compensate for the marijuana, pot, or other drugs in their blood
system, an impaired motorcyclist may shift their weight from one foot
to another, to maintain balance.
Police and
prosecutors will also evaluate issues with motorcyclists’ turning to
consider whether someone has been driving under the influence of
marijuana, pot, or other drugs. For instance, they may consider
whether the driver was unsteady, if the driver was late braking, or if
the driver had an improper lean angle during the turn.
Marijuana, pot, or other drugs in their blood system, may make an
impaired motorcyclist turn in a way that would arouse suspicions and
lead to a drug arrest or drug charge.
If police have conducted a drug stop, drug arrest, or drug search on
suspicion of driving a motorcycle under the influence of marijuana,
pot, or other drugs you need a drug lawyer who knows how to challenge
the drug charges. An aggressive drug lawyer will know how to
specifically challenge every part of the police and prosecutor’s
version of the drug arrest. An experienced drug lawyer will know
what strategy to pursue to influence a judge and jury on your driving
under the influence of marijuana or other drug charge.
Where did the word `marijuana' come from?
The
word `marijuana' is a Mexican slang term which became popular in the
late 1930's in America, during a series of media and government
programs which we now refer to as the `Reefer Madness Movement.' It
refers specifically to the medicine part of cannabis, which Mexican
soldiers used to smoke.
Today in the U.S.,
hemp (meaning the roots, stalk, and stems of the cannabis plant) is
legal to possess. No one can arrest you for wearing a hemp shirt, or
using hemp paper. Marijuana (The flowers, buds, or leaves of the
cannabis plant) is not legal to possess, and there are stiff fines and
possible jail terms for having any marijuana in your possession. The
seeds are legal to possess and eat, but only if they are sterilized
(will not grow to maturity.)
Since it is not
possible to grow the hemp plant without being in possession of
marijuana, the United States does not produce any industrial hemp
products, and must import them or, more often, substitute others.
(There is a way to grow hemp legally, but it involves filing an
application with the Drug Enforcement Administration and the DEA very
rarely ever gives its permission.) This does not seem to have stopped
people from producing and using marijuana, though. In many of the
United States, marijuana is the number one cash crop, mostly because
it fetches a very high price on the black market.
What are the statistics for marijuana in
America?
The federal government has estimated that nearly eighty million
Americans said they have smoked marijuana. Of these, twenty million
Americans smoked marijuana during the past year.
More than 700,000 Americans were arrested on marijuana charges last
year. In the last decade, more than 5 million Americans were
arrested for marijuana offenses. Almost 90 percent of these
arrests are for simple marijuana possession, not marijuana trafficking
or sale of marijuana.
According to NORML, for
approximately every 100 Americans who have tried marijuana, there is
only one regular user of cocaine or heroin.
What is the effect
of Gonzalez v. Raich—the recent Supreme Court ruling allowing the
United States Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Agency to
prosecute medical marijuana users—on state laws allowing medical
marijuana?
Currenlty, twelve
states have laws allowing medical marijuana. Alaska, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode
Island, Vermont and Washington.
In a 6 to 3 vote, the
Supreme Court decided that Justice Department has the authority to
arrest and charge state authorized medical marijuana patients for
violating the federal Controlled Substances Act. The case has the
citation Gonzalez v. Raich
545 U.S. 1 (2005).
It is important to
note that Gonzalez v. Raich does not give the federal law enforcement
agencies more power to arrest or charge. Gonzalez v. Raich only
strengthened the federal prosecutors’ argument that they can conduct
marijuana arrests and press federal marijuana charges despite state
marijuana laws, county marijuana laws, or city marijuana laws.
Experienced drug
attorneys do not think that federal agents will increase drug arrests
or drug charges against state authorized marijuana possessors,
marijuana sellers, or marijuana manufacturers. Likewise,
knowledgeable drug defense lawyers do not think that state and local
police, who must enforce state marijuana law and local marijuana law,
will disrespect the medical marijuana laws that were voted into law.
However, it is clear
that there is a tension between state marijuana law and city marijuana
law on one hand and federal marijuana law on the other. An
informed drug lawyer will know the difference and how to aggressively
exploit the difference on behalf of his client who was subjected to a
drug stop, drug arrest, or drug charge.
Are there more
minority drug users or white drug users?
Pot or other illegal drug possession and pot or other illegal drug
selling occurs among minorities and whites in the United States.
Some statistics have shown five times as many whites use pot and
illegal drugs as minorities in the United States. However the war on
drugs has, since its inception, seemed to target those who are Black,
Latino or people of color.
A competent drug lawyer will know about racial profiling to help you
fight your drug arrest or drug prosecution. You should ensure that
your marijuana defense attorney knows your situation and knows how to
aggressively argue racial profiling to the judge and jury if it is
applicable.
|